|
Welcome to Basic Bible Studies!
Articles » False-Teachers >> View Article
|
 |
|
 |
| Three Major Problems with the Philosophy Behind the Emerging Church |
By:
Brent Barnett of www.relevantbibleteaching.com |
|
|
Problem #1:
Culture (i.e. postmodernism) dictates church practice (i.e. methodology).
This is seen in the fact that the emerging church relies upon incense, art, images, and experiences to draw near to God and to worship Him. God says to worship Him in Spirit and in truth, but the emerging church finds ways other than what is described in the Bible to worship God. Worship consists of praising God through words and phrases that form coherent thoughts and propositions. It is not an emptying of the mind or any kind of mysticism. Yet the emerging church is a breeding ground of contemplative spirituality. Some use labyrinths to draw near to God. Others marvel at pictures that they paint. Others pray breath prayers which are vain repetitions which seek to empty the mind and literally hear a word from God. These are postmodern methods to “worship” the God of the Bible. The problem is that they are actually old Roman Catholic mystic methods, which the Protestant church distanced itself from. In an effort to be cutting edge, new, and conforming to culture, the emerging church is going backwards in time, repeating mistakes of history. This is why the Bible must dictate worship and not culture. Postmodernism has nothing to do with how God says we ought to worship. Cultures must conform to the godly culture described in the early church in the book of Acts. The church does not bend to culture. If it does, it will likely be assimilated and lose its identity, power, and worth. The church is the pillar and support of the truth even in an age that doesn’t acknowledge truth.
Problem #2:
Theology is in a state of flux, changing as experiences, personal preferences, and needs change.
Simple words and phrases such as “Jesus is God” and “by faith alone and grace alone” have sent people to their death as martyrs. They are the difference between saving faith and an eternity in hell. They are what separates cults from the true church of Jesus Christ. Yet for the emerging church, theology is not something that we can be dogmatic about. They say that good people have come to different conclusions over the years so why bother to make conclusive statements about theology at all? Thus, theology is not something concrete, absolute, and authoritative. In the past, people believed one way or another. Somebody was right and somebody was wrong. Now nobody knows who is right and who is wrong and that doesn’t seem to bother anybody. This is the spirit of antichrist, tolerating anything and everything and standing upon nothing. The church is the pillar and support of the truth, and the truth is a body of doctrine surrounding Jesus Christ. Without a confession of theology, there is no church. Thus, the emerging church is in many ways just an appeal to postmodernists who like to shape their religion and their God based upon how they feel on a given day.
Problem #3:
Preaching is outdated because this generation does not like someone speaking to them authoritatively, especially if they dare to tell them that they are in the wrong.
This belief flows out of the previous two. If methods can be changed, why do we still need to preach? Some churches get rid of the pulpit because it is intimidating and authoritative. The emerging church gets rid of preaching altogether. Somebody might sit amongst a circle of peers and share what they think God is all about for them that particular day or week. They might reference a Scripture which relates to their journey, but their experience and feelings are front and center and not the Word of God. If somebody actually shares by standing up and opening up the Bible, they do not exhort or call to change and action. They narrate a story or read a passage of Scripture and stop. There is no need to exhort, rebuke, or call to action. It is not about conforming to an authoritative statement of Scripture, but rather using Scripture to fortify fleshly desires of a journey that we take on our terms. The emerging church disdains preaching because preaching asserts that there is a right and wrong and makes it sound as if the preacher actually knows the truth, implying that those who disagree are wrong. From the perspective of the emerging church, may such things never be. The irony is that they can call preaching wrong or bad, but preachers cannot do that. This is the problem with postmodern philosophies. They can’t be argued if one is to be consistent with them.
Conclusion
At the end of the day, the emerging church doesn’t even know what it is or what it believes. All is in flux, doubt reigns supreme, and experience and feeling are the rule. The funny thing is that the emerging church does seem to have some core beliefs, the largest being a commitment to the environment. There is an unwritten but popular belief that finally mankind will get it right as Jesus imparts grace to all. This earth will be our future home, and thus we had better take good care of it. That all men will be saved one way or the other by grace is called the New Perspective on Paul, propagated by N.T. Wright. Some of these issues can’t be attributed directly to the emerging church or any church in particular. This is because what emerging church leaders and attenders believe varies from leader to leader, from person to person, from church to church, and from day to day. Yet certain philosophies make the rounds, this being one of them.
The emerging church is a contradiction and an ethereal entity. It is always unsure of itself, keeping up a continual “conversation” (one of their favorite words) but never coming to any real conclusions. This is something to really be wary of because the deceptions are more subtle in practice than it might at first seem. It took me a long period of time of researching this movement before I could get my brain around it. It is not a Biblical movement because it denies the authority of the Word of God and elevates man to an improper place, one which is higher than God.
Will the movement last? As long as this generation likes it, it will. The trick of making church conform to culture is an old trick. The seeker-targeted leaders used programs and business strategies to market church to selfish appeals. Man was elevated in that his felt needs dictated what could be preached, how church should operate, and how the preacher ought to speak. The emerging church also lets the culture and the lusts of the unbeliever and of the professing believer dictate practice and belief. It just happens to be postmodern in nature instead of modern.
Yet only one thing will ultimately prevail. Cultures change, philosophies change, and movements come and go, but the Word of the Lord endures forever. Praise Him for His absolute nature and utter consistency. God is very clear about who He is, what He believes, and what He expects. Those who don’t conform to His revealed Word will be judged by it.
When deceptions increase and their level of deceitfulness along with them, we must always turn to the Word of God because only it remains unchangeable. When a movement like the emerging church attacks the fact that logic is valid and that the Scriptures can even be understood, we had better be wary. God doesn’t want to undermine His own Word. Why would He have bothered giving it to us in the first place if we can’t understand it? When all is in supposed flux, God and His Word are immutable. Though people throughout history have tried to undermine the Word of God, God preserves it, and He always will. It is time to have a conversation with God through an appropriation of His Word. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
